The Impact of Energy Subsidy Polices on Gross Domestic Product Growth: Evidence from Emerging and Developing Economies

Authors

  • Abdelaziz Abdelmegid Ali Higher Institute of Administrative Sciences in Janaklees, Elbehera, Egypt,
  • Hamada Salah Youssef Faculty of Politics and Economics, Suez University, Egypt,
  • Ghada H. Ashour Economics and Finance Program, School of Business, University of Hertfordshire, Cairo, Egypt,
  • Mohamed Noureldin Sayed Pharaohs Higher Institute for Computer Information Systems and Management, Giza, Egypt.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.24196

Keywords:

Energy Subsidies, Economic Growth, Panel Data

Abstract

This study examines the impact of energy subsidy policies on economic growth in ten emerging and developing economies: China, India, Russia, Egypt, Mexico, Indonesia, Algeria, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, and Iran, during the period 2010–2024, using a Panel ARDL model estimated through the Pooled Mean Group (PMG) approach. The results show that energy subsidies have a positive, albeit limited, effect on GDP growth, with a 1% increase in subsidies raising GDP only by 0.011% in the long run and 0.009% in the short run. In contrast, gross fixed capital formation and population growth show much stronger positive effects, with elasticity coefficients of 0.99% and 1.19%, respectively. The findings suggest that while energy subsidies may stimulate economic activity in the short term, they are relatively ineffective in supporting long-term growth. Accordingly, the study recommends a gradual reform of energy subsidy policies, and the redirection of financial savings towards productive investment and renewable energy sectors, to enhance financial sustainability and support sustainable economic development.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-05

How to Cite

Ali, A. A., Youssef, H. S., Ashour, G. H., & Sayed, M. N. (2026). The Impact of Energy Subsidy Polices on Gross Domestic Product Growth: Evidence from Emerging and Developing Economies. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 16(4), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.24196

Issue

Section

Articles