Socio-Economic Trade-offs of Large Hydropower Development for Community Livelihoods in Bagmati Province, Nepal

Authors

  • Gunaraj Neupane Faculty of Environmental Management, Sustainable Energy Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand
  • Yutthapong Pianrog Faculty of Environmental Management, Sustainable Energy Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand
  • Kua-anan Techato Faculty of Environmental Management, Sustainable Energy Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand
  • Hari Prasad Ghimire Faculty of Environmental Management, Sustainable Energy Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand; & Everest Center for Research and Development Partners, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.22755

Keywords:

Large hydropower, Sustainable Livelihoods Framework, displacement, environmental impacts, infrastructure development, Nepal

Abstract

Large hydropower development is widely promoted as a pathway for sustainable energy transition and economic growth, particularly in mountainous countries such as Nepal. However, its socio-economic implications at the community level remain contested. This study examines the impacts of large hydropower development on community livelihoods in Nepal’s Bagmati Province using secondary time-series data covering the period 2015–2024. Guided by the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework, the study employs descriptive analysis, correlation analysis, multiple regression, and factor analysis to assess relationships between infrastructure development, employment, income, environmental impacts, and displacement. The results reveal a clear development–displacement paradox. While infrastructure development and household income increased over time, environmental impacts emerged as the strongest driver of displacement, outweighing the mitigating effects of economic and infrastructure gains. Employment and income improvements alone were insufficient to offset livelihood disruption. Factor analysis identified two dominant pathways: an economic–infrastructure pathway that enhances physical and financial capital, and an environmental–displacement pathway that erodes natural capital and increases livelihood vulnerability. The findings highlight that environmental degradation plays a central role in shaping livelihood outcomes in hydropower-affected areas. The study contributes empirical evidence from a Himalayan context and underscores the need for hydropower policies that prioritize environmental safeguards, livelihood restoration, and inclusive development to achieve socially sustainable energy transitions.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Neupane, G., Pianrog, Y., Techato, K.- anan, & Ghimire, H. P. (2026). Socio-Economic Trade-offs of Large Hydropower Development for Community Livelihoods in Bagmati Province, Nepal. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 16(2), 1194–1203. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.22755

Issue

Section

Articles