Retailer Value-at-Risk in Interconnected Power Markets: An Australian Empirical Analysis
Abstract
This paper investigates Value-at-Risk (VaR) in the Australian interconnected power markets. We model the price change using seven different volatility models and perform the back testing from both investors' (sellers' side) and retailers' (buyers' side) perspectives. From investors' perspective, we find that GARCH (1,1) model outperforms moving average (MA) and EWMA models. On the other hand, the moving average (MA) outperforms various GARCH (1,1) models from retailers' perspective. Our findings lead to a new insight to analyze carefully the position of modelling risk in power market since different position generates different result. Keywords: Power markets; Volatility; Value-at-Risk; Back-testingJEL Classifications: G17; G32; Q40Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2016-10-04
How to Cite
Handika, R., & Triandaru, S. (2016). Retailer Value-at-Risk in Interconnected Power Markets: An Australian Empirical Analysis. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(6S), 6–9. Retrieved from https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/3100
Issue
Section
Articles
Views
- Abstract 179
- PDF 189